Printer Friendly Version Print this thread
Email this thread to a friend eMail this thread to a friend
  • Buying Finance Websites (In: I Want to Sell My Website)
  • looking for free hosting site (In: I Want to Sell My Website)
  • Hosting in different Country (In: General Search Engine Optimization)
  • Featured Web Site Template

    Hundreds More at Free Site Templates.com!

    Web Site Partners
    Sponsored Links
    Jet City Software
     
    Whos Here ?
    There are 0 guests and 2 members in the forums right now.
    Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes
    Moderator(s): Prowler, jcokos
    Member Message

    inx|ollyski
    Joined: Nov 03, 2005
    # Posts: 11

    View the profile for inx|ollyski Send inx|ollyski a private message

    Posted: 2006-Jan-07 12:53
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Now please bear in mind the only reason I ask this question is because my company has a number of servers itself, so web hosting has never been a problem to get hold of. The only reason I've never thought of *buying* hosting, is because I have it on tap!

    However...

    I've been looking at migrating 4-5 PR 4 sites to paid hosting. The simple reason being, each site will be hosted from a unique IP.

    So say for $5-$10 a month. Will it, in your opinion, be worth paying to have these sites externally, in terms of the goodness I'll get out of having different IP, pages created, tailored and linked towards my main business site?

    Thanks.



    newtvail
    Joined: Jan 07, 2006
    # Posts: 303

    View the profile for newtvail Send newtvail a private message

    Posted: 2006-Jan-07 20:51
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    If the ONLY reason for buying external hosting is to get static IP addresses, you would probably be better off just renting the IP addresses. That way, you retain control of your sites. If IPv6 ever gets implimented, there will be so many available addresses the whole issue will pretty much go away.

    If you are considering hosting because there are things you'd rather have a 3rd party do for you, then it might well be worth doing.

    I'm not sure you can get a reasonable answer without posting more detail about exactly what you are after.



    inx|ollyski
    Joined: Nov 03, 2005
    # Posts: 11

    View the profile for inx|ollyski Send inx|ollyski a private message

    Posted: 2006-Jan-09 06:51
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Hi

    Please let me explain in more detail, and a little simpler.

    My site, and my other sub sites x, y and z are hosted on our own servers.

    Sites x, y and z currently link back (relatively - very similar content, not just a link there for the sake of it).


    Because the sites are currently hosted on the same server, Google I am guessing isn't giving us any browny points for sites x,y and z linking to my main site.

    However, if x,y and z are moved onto other servers (i.e. we buy hosting elsewhere), are we likely to see a return on the investment for doing so?

    I.e. is linking from seperate c classes, really worth the effort?

    Thanks!



    dirty_shame
    Joined: Aug 28, 2005
    # Posts: 191

    View the profile for dirty_shame Send dirty_shame a private message

    Posted: 2006-Jan-09 08:47
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    I disagree. Actually, the best reason to outsource your servers is connectivity. Unless you work for AT&T or NTT/Verio, for instance, your company servers are only as good as their corporate phone lines.

    If you don't have multiple/redundant fiber-optic connections or bomb-proof generator power backup to the building that houses your servers or data backup in different locations around the nation, etc., you're going to go down.

    IP blocks aren't a factor. Virtual Hosting defeats the whole issue anyway and there's no advantage in the SEs at all to having a "static" IP address anymore. Corporate servers are only good for internal networks and not very reliable for those sometimes.



    inx|ollyski
    Joined: Nov 03, 2005
    # Posts: 11

    View the profile for inx|ollyski Send inx|ollyski a private message

    Posted: 2006-Jan-10 13:53
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Yes but surely is site X links to main site (sharing the same IP), Google is not going to give that link any where as near a large a pat on the back, as in if site X was hosted on a different ip range..?

    I am not slightly interested in the 'outsourcing debate', neither the 'connectivity' of the site.

    I just want to do the right thing in terms of the search engines.



    seekz
    Joined: Jan 11, 2006
    # Posts: 19

    View the profile for seekz Send seekz a private message

    Posted: 2006-Jan-12 19:57
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    From what I heard, Google is aware of sites being on the same IP address and it would be better to have them in completely different IP blocks.

    Now Google is a member of ICANN, it wouldn't surprise me if they use whois details to check if the domains are owned by the same people.



    g1smd
    Staff
    Joined: Jul 28, 2002
    # Posts: 10465

    View the profile for g1smd Send g1smd a private message

    Posted: 2006-Jan-12 22:46
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Even if you do move them to separate IPs, Google already knows that they are related right now, and I would guess that you you still would not get any benefit from it.

    In fact, by so moving, they would now know that you were really trying to cheat the system. Leave this alone. Focus all of your energies on something more worthwhile.



    bhartzer
    Staff
    Joined: Jun 08, 2000
    # Posts: 7042

    View the profile for bhartzer Send bhartzer a private message

    Posted: 2006-Jan-12 23:09
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Google already knows that they are related right now

    That's very true. Google is also a registrar, so they also have access to your whois data--and the whois history, as well.


    You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:
    1. You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
    2. You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
    3. This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.

    If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions contained within.

    If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.

    If you are still experiencing problem, please read the Login Assistance Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.

    Switch to Advanced Editor and ... Create a New Topic or Reply to this Thread

    New posts Forum is locked
    © 1995  ·  iWeb, Inc  ·  DBA JimWorld Productions