Printer Friendly Version Print this thread
Email this thread to a friend eMail this thread to a friend
Featured Web Site Template

Hundreds More at Free Site Templates.com!

Web Site Partners
Sponsored Links
Jet City Software
 
Whos Here ?
Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes
Moderator(s): g1smd
Member Message

dudibob
Joined: Oct 13, 2005
# Posts: 1462

View the profile for dudibob Send dudibob a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-14 08:55
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

I'm in the middle of laying out ideas for a website redesign and was curious how many people still cater for 800X600 screen resolutions? or better yet, how many people design for mobile devices too.

It's been ticking away in my head, people using resolutions smaller than 1024 X 768 are about 8% of the overall traffic so it's still a significant amount but isn't it time they upgraded?



g1smd
Staff
Joined: Jul 28, 2002
# Posts: 10445

View the profile for g1smd Send g1smd a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-14 09:28
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Liquid lunch.... err, liquid layout, is the way to go. smile


Collapsable and expandable from 800 px wide to several thousand pixels wide.



dudibob
Joined: Oct 13, 2005
# Posts: 1462

View the profile for dudibob Send dudibob a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-14 09:53
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

haha, that's something I have been debating but the graphics and elements on page make it too hard to do and keep consistency across all web browsers.

The mock up I made looks good, easy to read, draws your eyes to the wanted areas but it comes up at 1000px and that's after I shrunk it down too :/ do you think this will be a problem?



g1smd
Staff
Joined: Jul 28, 2002
# Posts: 10445

View the profile for g1smd Send g1smd a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-14 10:25
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Not to me.... my main monitor is 2880 pixels wide, or something.



dudibob
Joined: Oct 13, 2005
# Posts: 1462

View the profile for dudibob Send dudibob a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-14 13:25
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

my main monitor is 2880 pixels wide, or something.


Wow, isn't that a little over kill even in this day and age!? and it sounds like you have a second monitor too smile



mj1256
Staff
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
# Posts: 920

View the profile for mj1256 Send mj1256 a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-14 16:42
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

he said "or something", mine goes to 2048.

if you decide not to go with fluid width, I have found that 1024 bridges the gap between widths quite nicely.



Curt
Joined: Eons Ago
# Posts: 3736

View the profile for Curt Send Curt a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-18 17:06
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Personally, I still design for 800px wide screens. Why? Because wider paragraphs are harder to read. People can more easily get lost in a very wide paragraph, but can follow a more narrow paragraph easily. However, if you're one that has a site with 2+ content columns (not including navigation column) side by side, the paragraphs would then be more narrow by design.

Another thing to consider is that many if not most people will not use their browser to the full width of the screen. One more thing: fluid widths are harder to design for and ensure that all widths will present a nice looking web page. Your pages may look aesthetically pleasing with a certain pixel width, but looks ugly when the page is much wider. Don't get hung up on trying to design for wide screens. In contrast, it is quite a nuisance for a person with a more narrow screen to be forced into sideways scrolling because of a widely formatted web page.

Narrow is more universally compatible. Put your pages on a diet wink



Quadrille
Joined: Nov 15, 2000
# Posts: 1064

View the profile for Quadrille Send Quadrille a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-18 17:20
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

I agree. I keep my pages well under 800.

I must admit that I hadn't realized how few people *need* that width - but I rarely use a browser full screen, and in my experience way fewer than 50% of users with larger screens do.

G1; do you stretch your browser to your possible 2880-ish?

I'm not knocking liquid layouts - but some of us don't have the skills or resources to go that way; and my priority has to be content, rather than visual beauty.



g1smd
Staff
Joined: Jul 28, 2002
# Posts: 10445

View the profile for g1smd Send g1smd a private message

Posted: 2008-Jul-18 22:57
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Rarely stretch all the way, but I might do that if I open a bucketload of tabs to make them all fit.


You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:
  1. You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
  2. You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
  3. This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.

If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions contained within.

If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.

If you are still experiencing problem, please read the Login Assistance Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.

Switch to Advanced Editor and ... Create a New Topic or Reply to this Thread

New posts Forum is locked
© 1995  ·  iWeb, Inc  ·  DBA JimWorld Productions